Skip to main content
spine.uz

Lumbar spine · Operation

Endoscopic lumbar fusion

A cage and two pairs of small screws fix an unstable segment through endoscopic incisions. It is a bigger operation than decompression, chosen when the spine slips or has collapsed.

Reviewed by:Dr. Temur Anvarovich DuschanovEndoscopic spine surgeon, neurosurgeonUpdated
On this page
  1. In one minute
  2. What the operation is
  3. Who it is for
  4. How it is done
  5. Endoscopic compared with open surgery
  6. Risks and how we reduce them
  7. Recovery, week by week
  8. What the evidence says
  9. How we do it at spine.uz
  10. Preparing for the operation

In one minute

Endoscopic lumbar fusion joins two vertebrae (the bones of the spine) into one solid piece. Through an endoscope (a thin camera tube) the surgeon removes the worn disc, fills the space with bone graft and a cage (a small hollow spacer), and holds the segment still with screws placed through the skin. It is for a segment that slips or has collapsed, where freeing the nerve alone would not hold. Published series report roughly two to three hours of operating time, most often under general anaesthesia. Most patients walk within a day; the bone takes months to knit.

What the operation is

The full name is endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, shortened to endoscopic TLIF. "Transforaminal" means the surgeon enters through the foramen, the opening at the side of the spine where the nerve root leaves. Relatives are endoscopic PLIF (posterior lumbar interbody fusion, a more central angle), biportal or UBE (unilateral biportal endoscopic) fusion, which uses two small portals, and iLIF (endoscopic assisted intraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion).

A decompression removes what presses on the nerve and leaves the joint alone. A fusion goes further: the disc comes out, graft and cage go in, and screws stop the two vertebrae moving until they grow together.

Who it is for

Fusion is considered when a segment is unstable and the nerve is trapped at the same time: spondylolisthesis (one vertebra slipped forward on the one below) that moves on bending X-rays, a recurrent disc herniation at a level already operated on that has become loose, and foraminal stenosis (narrowing of the nerve opening) where the disc has collapsed so far that decompression alone would leave the nerve pinched.

Many slips do not need fusion. The North American Spine Society (NASS) guideline of 2014 suggests decompression with fusion for symptomatic stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis, yet finds that for a single-level, low-grade slip (under 20%) without lateral foraminal stenosis, decompression alone gives equivalent outcomes; both statements are grade B. Back pain alone, without a slip or a trapped nerve, is a weaker reason to fuse.

The published endoscopic fusion series are mostly one-level degenerative cases: 32 of the 42 studies in the 2022 meta-analysis were single-level, the rest one to two or more levels, and the endoscopic-versus-open study was limited to single-segment disease. That is where the technique has been tested so far. Soft bone that cannot hold screws, a high-grade slip, severe central stenosis, infection or deformity usually call for open surgery, described on the spinal fusion page.

How it is done

You lie face down. The endoscopic-versus-open study operated under general anaesthesia; among the endoscopic series in the 2022 meta-analysis, some used general anaesthesia with nerve monitoring, others conscious sedation or local anaesthesia.

A decompression alone is done through a 7 mm incision. Inserting a cage needs a wider corridor: the endoscopic-versus-open study describes a working tube of 11 mm inside diameter through a skin cut of roughly 13 mm. Dilators pass between the muscle fibres without cutting them, part of the facet joint is shaved to open the path, the disc is removed under the camera and the endplates (the cartilage layers on the bone) are scraped to bleeding bone. Graft is packed in and the cage inserted under X-ray guidance, with the decompression and the cage position checked on the screen before the tube comes out. The surgeon then places two screws on each side through stab incisions and joins them with rods. Single-level endoscopic fusion took a mean of about 180 minutes in that study, whose authors cite earlier endoscopic series ranging from about 168 to 286 minutes.

Endoscopic compared with open surgery

Endoscopic TLIF against tubular minimally invasive TLIF (MIS-TLIF): the 2024 meta-analysis of 13 studies and 1,015 patients found similar pain, disability, fusion and complication rates; the endoscopic group lost about 77 mL less blood, left hospital 2.15 days earlier and had less back pain in the first two weeks, while MIS-TLIF was 29 minutes faster. A 2022 meta-analysis of 42 studies agreed: less blood loss, a stay about two days shorter, no significant difference in complications or fusion.

One study of 30 endoscopic against 30 open interbody fusions: blood loss 63 versus 313 mL, stay 3.3 versus 7.0 days, fusion 93.3% versus 96.7%, operation 54 minutes longer with the endoscope.

The honest reading: similar results, less tissue damage, faster discharge, a longer operation, more X-ray exposure, a steep learning curve, and almost all of it observational rather than randomised.

Risks and how we reduce them

The 2022 meta-analysis lists the main complications. Endoscopic fusion: cage migration 1.1%, screw malposition 0.6%, infection 0.6%, pooled 4.7%. MIS-TLIF: screw malposition 1.6%, adjacent segment degeneration 1.5%, dural tears (a leak of spinal fluid) 1.3%, pooled 9.6%. The pooled comparison was borderline (p = 0.05) and the authors conclude that complication rates did not differ significantly.

Non-union, when the bone fails to bridge, is the complication specific to fusion: with fusion rates of 93.3% and 96.7% in the endoscopic-versus-open study, a few patients in every hundred do not knit fully, and a persistent non-union can need a second operation. Smoking works against it: a 2021 meta-analysis of 26 studies and 4,409 patients found that smokers fused significantly less often than non-smokers (odds ratio 0.55). The exiting nerve root can be irritated because the cage passes close to it. Cage subsidence (the cage sinking into soft bone) was 6.7% endoscopic versus 16.7% open in the head-to-head study. Screws hold the cage while the bone knits. Conversion to open surgery remains possible.

What we do: we perform the fusion fully endoscopically, with an interbody cage and percutaneous screws. Across all the team's operations our complication figure is well below 1%; our own figure, not a comparison.

Send your MRI — a doctor from the team answers you by voice within 48 hours.

Recovery, week by week

WhenWhat to expect
Day 0A short walk the same evening or next morning; published stays average 2.7 days in the 2022 meta-analysis and 3.3 days in the endoscopic-versus-open study.
Days 1 to 3Home for many. Short walks, no bending or lifting, a brace if your surgeon asks.
Week 2Stitches out. Longer walks; desk work for many.
Week 6A check X-ray in most protocols. Light duties, no heavy lifting.
Month 3Disability scores were better after endoscopic than open fusion at 1, 3 and 6 months in the head-to-head study, equal at 12.
Months 6 to 12Imaging to confirm bone bridging; heavy work and sport wait for it.

Contact us the same day, or go to emergency care, for new leg weakness, numbness in the saddle area, loss of bladder or bowel control, fever with a red or leaking wound, or sudden severe pain.

What the evidence says

SPORT (the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial, Weinstein and colleagues, 2007) followed 607 patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis: with about 40% crossover in the randomised cohort the intention-to-treat comparison showed no significant difference, while the as-treated analysis showed a substantial advantage for surgery at two years with little evidence of harm.

The American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons (AANS/CNS) fusion guideline of 2014 (Parts 9 and 11) finds that trials consistently show superior outcomes with surgery for stenosis with spondylolisthesis, with most surgical patients having some form of fusion, that no standard fusion technique can be recommended, and that interbody techniques give higher fusion rates than posterolateral fusion when there is instability.

The NASS guideline suggests instrumentation to improve fusion rates but not clinical outcomes, and calls the evidence on minimally invasive versus open technique conflicting.

How we do it at spine.uz

We are Tashkent's first endoscopic spine team, five surgeons operating as one, with 27,600+ endoscopic and spine operations. This page was reviewed by Dr. Shomansur Shotursunov, orthopaedic surgeon. We perform the fusion fully endoscopically: disc removal, decompression and cage placement under the camera, with an interbody cage and percutaneous screws.

Send your MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) and X-rays on Telegram or WhatsApp; a doctor from the team replies by voice within 48 hours, free of charge. After surgery you receive a written conclusion and follow-up on Telegram.

Preparing for the operation

Bring your MRI, standing and bending X-rays, any CT (computed tomography) scan, your medicines list and details of blood thinners so the surgeon can plan when to pause them. If you smoke, surgeons ask you to stop before and after a fusion, because smokers fuse less often than non-smokers in the published series. Expect an anaesthetist review, fasting from the night before and a day or more in the ward.

Questions

Does endoscopic fusion use implants?
Yes. A fusion always uses an interbody cage and pedicle screws. The difference from open fusion is that the cage and screws go in through small endoscopic and stab incisions rather than an open wound.
How long does the bone take to fuse?
Months. Published series judge fusion on imaging at 12 months or later, and the 2022 meta-analysis that reports fusion rates uses a minimum follow-up of one year. You walk within a day; the bone finishes its work over the following year.
Could I have a decompression instead of a fusion?
Often, yes. The North American Spine Society guideline finds that for a single-level, low-grade slip without foraminal narrowing, decompression alone gives equivalent results. Fusion is considered for segments that move on bending X-rays, have collapsed, or have been operated on before.
Is the endoscopic fusion safer than the open one?
The published meta-analyses find similar complication and fusion rates, with less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay for the endoscopic technique, and a longer operation; the 2024 review also notes that the endoscopic technique needs repeated X-ray guidance. Nobody has shown it to be safer; it loses less blood and sends you home sooner.
Will I need a brace?
Some surgeons ask for a light brace for the first weeks, others do not. Your surgeon decides case by case and writes it in your conclusion.

Sources

  1. Diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, 2nd edition (evidence-based clinical guideline) · North American Spine Society, 2014
  2. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: lumbar fusion for stenosis with spondylolisthesis · AANS/CNS Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2014
  3. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 11: interbody techniques for lumbar fusion · AANS/CNS Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2014
  4. Comparison of clinical outcomes and complications between endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis · Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2024
  5. Clinical outcomes, complications and fusion rates in endoscopic assisted intraforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (iLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF): systematic review and meta-analysis · Scientific Reports, 2022
  6. The effect of smoking on the fusion rate of spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis · World Neurosurgery, 2021
  7. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (SPORT) · New England Journal of Medicine, 2007
  8. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic and open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-segmental lumbar degenerative diseases · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2022

A patient from Tashkent reached out 2 hours ago